Hey, @track-volunteers,
I’ve been going non-stop between finishing up the meet, coordinating the board meeting, and working on Skunk, but I didn’t want to forget to solicit any suggestions about how to improve things for the future while the meet is still fresh. Overall, the meet went well for runners, and I’ve fielded a number of compliments from runners and coaches. Good work, as always!
That said, I think this was one of our tougher meets in a while. I’m chalking a bunch of it up to Daylight Saving Time and lots of people—including the runners!—being just a little off due to lack of sleep. Toward the end, we were all also getting punchy because of the length of the meet, which was partly my fault for adding the 400m (and 40 extra minutes). I agreed to that months ago at a request from a coach only because March is normally our smallest meet, not our largest. That won’t happen again!
Nonetheless, even though we dropped a heat in each of the 60m, 400m, and 200m, we were running behind from the very start of the meet. The lag increased from 10 minutes after the first event to 35 minutes by the end. Not a big deal, but that’s the first time my pre-meet time estimates have been off by more than a few minutes.
Some notes I have:
-
When we do the 400m, we should remember that the first few heats of little kids can be done via a waterfall start rather than in lanes. It will run faster and be easier for them. We did this successfully with the first few heats of the 4x200m.
-
We need to bring a garbage can over near the check-in area because a fair amount of trash and recycling is generated there.
-
I want to brainstorm, particularly with Heather, Rich, and Sandy, about better ways to transition between events, particularly the 60m/100m that start at the far end of the track. It feels like we’re having trouble hitting escape velocity on the first heat or two, after which things run smoothly. Is there something we can do, perhaps by separating the clerk-of-course jobs differently, to get that first heat on the track more quickly while everyone else is lining up?
-
We added a sign about filling out a Change card for people who needed heat changes, which generated more changes than normal—at least 25 in total—with more than half being Add or Changes that required seeding adjustments. That in turn meant that Jesse and Laurel were reseeding regularly. Although it was good that we condensed a heat in each of the sprints, we also had runners who were confused or even missed their heat because they didn’t know the seed sheets had changed. My sense is that while we want to be flexible about seed changes when it’s important, we should not be encouraging it generally.
-
I got the impression that runners weren’t being good about checking in with the clerks-of-course at this meet, and I don’t know why. That’s why we have the flags up in the infield and use the hurdles to line up sprint heats—when a heat is ready, the runners can be walked to the start as soon as the track is clear from the previous heat. Maybe runners were being dopey from Daylight Saving Time? Perhaps my announcements weren’t sufficiently emphasizing the need to check in? Or maybe we need to educate runners about the need for heat check-ins when they get their bib?
Anything else on your mind?